We are exploring creative ways to support the management of sacred sites by stewards like Leonell. Proposed initiatives include installing simple signage, collaborating with landholders to plant sacred tree species, and restoring tree cover on the mountain. If you would like to get involved or contribute directly to the community management group, please don’t hesitate to reach out.
|
Leonell calls himself a vanilla farmer, but his agroforestry system extends far beyond vanilla. It is a diverse and dynamic example of sustainable agroecological farming. Pictured on the left, Leonell proudly displays his healthy vanilla crop—he insisted on capturing this moment with his impressive harvest. However, Leonell is more than a farmer; he is also a sacred land steward. As the third generation of caretakers for the sacred waterfall on Ambanitaza mountain, he considers it his responsibility to protect the land and encourage restoration of the mountaintop to ensure the waterfall continues to flow.
Leonell also urges visitors to the sacred site to respect the land and adhere to its taboos. Key taboos include leaving no trash or waste behind, refraining from taking offerings, and avoiding tree cutting near the waterfall. These practices are essential for preserving the sanctity and health of this cherished site. Look forward to our future publications that share the stories and experiences of other land stewards around Ambanitaza. These individuals remind us that land is more than just a source of resources; it sustains our souls and nurtures our health as well. |
What is a key stakeholder? I define key stakeholders as those who truly have skin in the game—not just individuals or groups with influence over land management decisions, but also those whose lives, livelihoods, and cultures are deeply intertwined with the land. In restoration efforts, it’s crucial to recognize not only those living on the forest frontiers but also those who depend on ecosystem services provided by the forests— these people might live far away from protected areas but they are still important stakeholders.
In this case, the key stakeholders include individuals and communities within the mountain’s watershed who depend on its resources for survival. They rely on its water to sustain their fields, rice paddies, and daily lives. The mountain is also a culturally significant site for many people in the region, further emphasizing the importance of restoration and conservation in this area. |
Travel by foot down a dirt road four hours, and you’ll arrive at a small yet vibrant community tree nursery in Tsaratanana. This newly established nursery is one of several now surrounding the sacred mountain Ambanitaza. Through community-based action research, we demonstrate how research can help catalyze and inform projects like these.
Here’s how it all began: To better understand the drivers of environmental change and the demand for land restoration we conducted surveys with over 1,000 households. We asked them how they viewed the health of the land and the need for restoration. We explored farmer's perspectives on the best approaches to protect their lands and how this knowledge could be effectively transferred within and across communities around the mountain. Stay tuned for our upcoming publication on this research. Preliminary results revealed that farmers strongly advocated for support in establishing small community tree nurseries in every hamlet, emphasizing the need for diverse species—native trees, medicinal plants, food crops, and cash crops. Only one year after this research was conducted, the call for action was answered by the DLC SAVA Conservation initiative. Now, each tree nursery is filled with culturally and environmentally relevant species. |
To better understand how farmers might respond to market changes and conservation incentives, we worked with vanilla growers in northeast Madagascar to test their willingness to try new crops and support forest protection. We used interactive tablet-based games, designed to simulate real-life challenges, with 204 farmers divided into small groups of six. Through these activities, we explored how price changes and financial incentives could influence their land use decisions. Most importantly, we engaged directly with farmers through focus group discussions to understand what these dynamics mean to them in their daily lives.
Funded by: Partnerships for Enhanced Engagement in Research (PEER) USAID |
This research is now published, visit my blog for a description of our findings or find the article here in the journal of Biological Conservation.
For small-scale farmers, cultivating a variety of crops helps mitigate risks from pests, extreme weather, or market fluctuations. If one crop fails, others remain as a safety net. Scientists have widely highlighted the benefits of crop diversification, linking it to positive conservation outcomes, enhancing biodiversity and nutrient cycling, and maintaining healthy soils. In addition, diversification supports food security and can provide medicinal resources to rural farmers. For these reasons, this strategy has been practiced by farmers across the world for generations. However, with the globalization of agriculture in the 20th century, the rise of lucrative cash crops led many farmers to focus on monocultures—growing only one crop. Particularly in the Global South, historical market systems shaped by unequal land and resource distribution continue to influence farming practices today. While monocultures on productive land and with adequate resources can be profitable in the short-term, they often lock farmers into input-intensive systems that can have long-term detrimental effects on the environment and human health. Northeast Madagascar, often called the "vanilla capital of the world," is characterized by these challenges. Most families rely on vanilla as their primary source of income (in addition to rice), but when prices drop, their livelihoods and food security are threatened. In such cases, crop diversification becomes a vital coping strategy. Yet, the need for more land to grow food during economic shocks—or to expand cash crop production during market booms—can drive deforestation, putting remaining forest areas under pressure. |